Perancangan Enterprise Architecture untuk Meningkatkan Indeks SPBE Pemerintah Daerah: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Tasikmalaya
Abstract
Enterprise architecture has become one of the most crucial strategic tools in the development of information technology within an organization, particularly in the public sector such as government, as it can enhance public service performance and reduce costs. In the Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD), it was found that the assessment domain index of the National SPBE in Tasikmalaya Regency is 2.0, with the smallest value in the SPBE governance and SPBE management domains. This is partly due to the absence of enterprise architecture as a foundation or reference for implementing SPBE services in Tasikmalaya Regency. Therefore, the research adopts the methodology of the national SPBE framework or master plan as the initial reference in designing enterprise architecture, following the steps outlined in the TOGAF framework. In the business architecture, simplification is applied, reducing seven sub-activities to two new sub-activities, while addressing seven major changes to confront strategic issues. In the data architecture, five significant changes are identified as solutions to data issues in the Tasikmalaya Regency Local Government. The application architecture encompasses six significant solutions to address internal organizational issues and integrate them with the national SPBE architecture. In the technology architecture, two new technologies are added to support business, data, and application processes. In the security architecture domain, nine security additions are implemented to protect the organization from attacks on its information systems. The planning of architectural changes is structured according to the RPJMD period, spanning five years from 2026 to 2030.
Downloads
References
M. D. Lytras and A. C. Şerban, “E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 65313–65326, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982737.
N. N. Qomariyah and A. Priandoyo, “Industry 4.0 strategic alignment framework: Multilevel perspective of digital transition in Indonesia,” in Proceeding - ICoSTA 2020: 2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications: Empowering Industrial IoT by Implementing Green Technology for Sustainable Development, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Feb. 2020. doi: 10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570611033.
M. Whisper, van D. Liezl, and C. Rojanette, “Development of an Industry 4.0 Competency Maturity Model,” SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, 2021.
D. Wulandari, S. F. S. Gumilang, and R. Mulyana, “PERANCANGAN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE LAYANAN SPBE (E-GOVERNMENT) DI LINGKUNGAN PEMKAB SUKABUMI,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–26, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v8i1.1204.
S. R. Chohan and G. Hu, “Success Factors Influencing Citizens’ Adoption of IoT Service Orchestration for Public Value Creation in Smart Government,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 208427–208448, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036054.
R. Awaludin Rizal, R. Sarno, and K. Rossa Sungkono, “COBIT 5 for analysing information technology governance maturity level on masterplan E-Government,” in Proceedings - 2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: IT Challenges for Sustainability, Scalability, and Security in the Age of Digital Disruption, iSemantic 2020, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Sep. 2020, pp. 517–522. doi: 10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234301.
Presiden Republik Indonesia, Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Indonesia, 2018.
Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi, Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Indonesia, 2020.
P. R. Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 132. 2022.
Bappeda, “RPJMD Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Tahun 2021-2026.” Badan Perencanaan Daerah Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tasikmalaya, Kabupaten Tasikmalaya, pp. 1–587, 2021.
Presiden Republik Indonesia, Perpres Nomor 95 Tahun 2018.
H. Winarno, “Perencanaan Enterprise Architecture berdasarkan Kerangka Kerja TOGAF: Studi Kasus PT XYZ,” Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2021.
M. Defriani and M. G. Resmi, “E-Government Architectural Planning Using Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework in Purwakarta Districts Government,” in 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 2019, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/ICIC47613.2019.8985819.
A. Dwi Palupi and R. Maulidina Surosa, Enterprise Architecture Design for Construction Services Using The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF): Case Study Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia; Enterprise Architecture Design for Construction Services Using The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF): Case Study Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia. 2018.
A. K. Darmawan, F. Masykur, M. Muhsi, B. A. Umam, and R. Rofiuddin, “Proposing Enterprise Architecture for Smart Regencies in Indonesia: A Perspective of Zachman Framework (ZF),” in 9th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: Recover Together, Recover Stronger and Smarter Smartization, Governance and Collaboration, ICISS 2022 - Proceeding, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICISS55894.2022.9915118.
C. Gebayew and A. A. Arman, “Modify TOGAF ADM for Government Enterprise Architecture : Case Study in Ethiopia,” in 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT), 2019, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICWT47785.2019.8978260.
A. B. Costa and M. A. Brito, “Enterprise Architecture Management Constant maintenance and updating of the Enterprise Architecture,” in Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI, IEEE Computer Society, 2022. doi: 10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820068.
T. K. Hazra and B. Unhelkar, Enterprise Architecture for Digital Business: Integrated Transformation Strategies. CRC Press, 2020.
R. D. Schilling, “Theories to Understand the Dynamic Nature of Enterprise Architecture,” in Proceedings - IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOCW, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Nov. 2018, pp. 153–161. doi: 10.1109/EDOCW.2018.00030.
Open Group, The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Version 9. Van Haren Pub, 2009.
D. Coghlan and T. Brannick, Doing Action Research In Your Own Organization. Sage Publication Ltd, 2005.
G. Gioferi and Y. Yulhendri, “Penilaian Risiko TI Pada Website DosenIT Dengan Framework ISO 31000 Dan ISO 27002,” Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 409–419, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v5i4.897.
E. Komarudin, R. S. Bahri, D. F. Maulana, and A. R. Maulana, “Model Perancangan Aplikasi Pesantren Matic Pada Forum Pondok Pesantren Jawa Barat,” 2019.
L. H. Annisa, “Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi pada Pengembangan Rancangan Model Rantai Pasok pada Bidang Pertanian,” 2023.
D. Pramudya, A. Zaidiah, B. Triwahyono, P. Studi Sistem Informasi, and F. Ilmu Komputer UPN, APLIKASI PROMOSI PARIWISATA BERBASIS WEB DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN FRAMEWORK CODEIGNITER. Jakarta: Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Ilmu Komputer dan Aplikasinya (SENAMIKA), 2020.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
