Jurnal Perbandingan Analisis Metode Saw Dan Topsis (Studi Kasus Percetakan)

Abstract
In the analysis of decision making on problems based on subjective personal analysis without using a particular method, there is usually a high error rate so this will endanger decision making which will lead to regret. There are several types of methods and one of them is the Decision Support System (DSS) method which can be used for the decision making process, but there are 2 methods that are often used in analyzing the decision making process, namely the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and Technique For Others Referencean by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). To find out the best name between the two methods, several weighting changes were made and the test results showed similarities in the decision making (problem solving) process. The purpose of this research is whether decision making can use one of the SAW or TOPSIS methods. From this, it can result in a ranking of the 2 methods that produce the best solutions, which will determine strategic locations to increase the turnover of printing businesses (MSMEs).
References
] Afidah Rozi Anti, K. A. (t.t.). PENGELOLAAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN BISNIS PERCETAKAN PADA RUMAHGRAFIKA PEKALONGAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF ETIKA BISNIS ISLAM.
] Darmawan, F. R., Amalia, E. L., & Rosiani, U. D. (2021). Penerapan Metode Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Kota yang Menerapkan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang di Sebabkan Wabah Corona. Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (Justin), 9(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v9i2.43896
] Fitriady, M. Y. (t.t.). STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN USAHA PERCETAKAN EKA MULIA JATI (EMJ) PRODUCTION (STUDI KASUS USAHA INDUSTRI KECIL PERCETAKAN EMJ PRODUCTION DI DESA CEMPAKA PUTIH, KECAMATAN CIPUTAT TIMUR TANGERANG SELATAN).
] Henri Aprianti, H. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone dengan Menerapkan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW).
] Jufri, H. A., & Hamka, U. (2022). PERHITUNGAN MANUAL DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODA SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). 2(10).
] Lauryn, M. S., Ibrohim, M., & Fasambi, A. (2023). Penerapan Metode Topsis Dalam Penentuan Penerima Dana Bantuan Masyarakat Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah. ProTekInfo(Pengembangan Riset dan Observasi Teknik Informatika), 10(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.30656/protekinfo.v10i1.6178
] Mailasari, M. (2016). MODEL MULTI ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING DALAM PENENTUAN PENERIMA PINJAMAN. 1.
] Modul Sistem Penunjang Keputusan.pdf. (t.t.).
] Munadi, R., Mukhroji, M., Syahrial, S., & Meutia, E. D. (2018). Penerapan Multiple Attribute Decision Making dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting untuk Pemeringkatan Kerentanan Keamanan Website. ELKOMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Energi Elektrik, Teknik Telekomunikasi, & Teknik Elektronika, 6(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.26760/elkomika.v6i2.194
] Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Prestasi Dosen.pdf. (t.t.).
] Putri, N. A. (t.t.). ANALISIS PROSES BISNIS PADA PERCETAKAN BHINNEKA RIYANT.
] Rina Candra Noor Santi, S. E. (2010). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Prestasi Dosen Berdasarkan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK Volume XV, No.2, Juli 2010 : 136-142, XV, 136–142.
] Talan, E. Y. C., & Sari, R. P. (2020). PENERAPAN METODE TOPSIS PADA SISTEM PENENTUAN DUSUN PENERIMA DANA DESA. 08.
] Trise Putra, D. W., Santi, S. N., Swara, G. Y., & Yulianti, E. (2020). METODE TOPSIS DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN OBJEK WISATA. Jurnal Teknoif Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Padang, 8(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21063/jtif.2020.V8.1.1-6
] Universitas Dharma Andalas, Sularno, S., Prima Mulya, D., Zulfahmi, Z., Faradika, F., & Razi A, M. (2021). SISTEM PENUNJANG KEPUTUSAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN (PADANG HEALTH) DENGAN METODE AHP (STUDI KASUS: PELAYANAN KESEHATAN UNTUK DOSEN DAN KARYAWAN UNIVERSITAS DHARMA ANDALAS). Jurnal Sains dan Informatika, 7(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.22216/jsi.v7i2.724

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.