Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pasca Uu No. 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Peradilan Agama

  • Maulana Ira Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Aceh Tamiang

Abstract

This study aims to describe the issuance of Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning the Religious Courts which has increased the authority of the Religious Courts. The mandate of the law instructs religious courts to not only accept, examine, decide, and adjudicate marriage and inheritance cases, but also have the authority to resolve sharia economic disputes. This research uses a normative juridical research method. Normative juridical research is research that examines various laws and regulations that apply or are applied to a particular legal problem. Normative juridical law research is often referred to as doctrinal law research. From the results of this study, it is explained in the explanation of article 49 letter (i) of Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts. This indicates that apart from the religious judiciary, it is not allowed to accept, examine, decide, and adjudicate sharia economic cases. The absolute authority of the religious court has been patented by the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 93/PUU-X/2012 which stipulates that sharia economic disputes are the absolute authority of the religious courts. The Constitutional Court's decision at the same time eliminates dualism in the judicial environment to resolve sharia economic dispute cases.

 

Keywords: Sharia Economic Disputes, Religious Courts, Authority

References

Bahri, S. (2017). Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(01), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v1i01.1124

DALIMUNTHE, M. A. R. (2014). KEWENANGAN PERADILAN AGAMA MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM EKONOMI SYARIAH (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Putusan Pengadilan tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Ekonomi Syariah). In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (Vol. 7, Issue 2). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Haryanti, T. (2013). Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Tahkim, IX(1), 74–87.

Mas’ud, M., Rosbandi, & Suryagalih, S. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Pasca Uu Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Jo Nomor 50 Tahun 2009. Islamika, 15(1), 28–45.

Nurhayati. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v3i1.2118

Nurhayati, S. (2012). Penguatan Peran Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/Puu-X/2012. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, YUDISIA, 7.

Rasyid, A. (2019). Kewenangan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2.256

Umam, A. K. (2016). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia. Risalah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 1(1), 1–15.

Wijayati, M. (2014). PERADILAN AGAMA DAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARI’AH (Studi Atas Efektifitas UU No 3 Tahun 2006 di Kota Metro). Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 7(2), 107–115.

Published
2022-07-01
How to Cite
Ira, M. (2022). Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pasca Uu No. 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Sosial Budaya, 1(2), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.47233/jppisb.v1i2.483