Kajian Sektor Unggulan Kota Padang di Provinsi Sumatera Barat Menggunakan Metode Location Quotient

  • Yenni Del Rosa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Dharma Andalas
  • Nofri Yendra Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Dharma Andalas
Keywords: leading sector, Location Quotient (LQ) method, sektor unggulan, metode Location Quotient (LQ)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify the leading sectors as the leading sector in the city of Padang, the capital city of West Sumatra province, using the Location Quotient (LQ) method. The research data is in the form of secondary data, the type of ratio data, namely the GDP of the city of Padang in 2017-2021 according to the field of business (sector) based on the 2010 ADHB base year. The research population is 12 districts and 7 cities in the province of West Sumatra and the sample is the city of Padang determined by the purposive sampling technique. Processing and analyzing data using quantitative descriptive statistics.  Based on the LQ analysis, the city of Padang in 2021 has 11 categories of business fields as its leading sectors as follows: 1) processing industry, 2) water supply, waste management and recycling, 3) transportation and warehousing, 4) information and communication, 5) services finance and insurance, 6) real estate, 7) corporate services, 8) government administration, defense and social security, 9) education services, 10) health services and social activities, 11) other services. Of the 11 categories of business fields, the company service sector has the highest LQ value as the leading sector with the largest contribution to GRDP.

 

ABSTRAK

         Tujuan penelitian identifikasi sektor-sektor unggulan sebagai leading sector kota Padang ibu kota provinsi Sumatera Barat menggunakan metode Location Quotient (LQ).  Data  penelitian  berupa data sekunder jenis data rasio yakni PDB kota Padang tahun 2017 – 2021 menurut lapangan usaha (sektor) berdasarkan  ADHB tahun dasar 2010. Populasi penelitian 12 kabupaten dan 7 kota di provinsi Sumatera Barat serta sampelnya kota Padang ditentukan dengan teknik purposive sanpling. Pengolahan dan analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif kuantitatif. Berdasarkan analisis LQ kota Padang tahun 2021 mempunyai 11 kategori lapangan usaha sebagai sektor unggulannya sebagai berikut :  1) industri pengolahan, 2) pengadaan air, pengelolaan sampah limbah dan daur ulang, 3) transportasi dan pergudangan, 4) informasi dan komunikasi, 5) jasa keuangan dan asuransi, 6) real estate, 7) jasa perusahaan, 8) administrasi pemerintahan,  pertahanan dan  jaminan sosial, 9) jasa pendidikan, 10) jasa kesehatan dan kegiatan sosial, 11) jasa lainnya.  Dari 11 kategori lapangan usaha tersebut sektor jasa perusahaan mempunyai nilai LQ paling tinggi sebagai sektor unggulan yang paling besar kontribusinya terhadap PDRB.

References

Anderson, Kym & Richard Blackhurst. 1993. Regional Integration and Global Trading System. New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Armstrong, H dan Jim Taylor. 2007. Regional Economics and Policy. Third Edition. Brighton : Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Atkinson, R.D & Stephan, J.E. 2012. Innovation of Economic : The Race for Global Advantage Connecticut. New York : Yale University Pres.

Azhari, Gito, Mohd.N.S, Ishak Hasan & M.Shabri A.M. 2017. The Role of Cooperative in the Indonesian Economy. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. Vol.6(10). pp. 43-49.

Bharadwaj, B. 2012. Roles of Cooperarative Societies in Poverty Reduction : A Case of Nepal. Administration and Management Review. Vol. 24(1 ). pp. 120-139.

Blair, John, P. 1991. Urban and Regional Economics. Homewood Illinois : Irwin Co.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia. Jakarta : BPS.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Sumatera Barat Dalam Angka 2020. Padang. BPS.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Kota Padang Dalam Angka 2020. Padang : BPS.

Barro,R.J.2000. Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of Economic Growth. 5(1). pp. 5-32. https://doi.org/10.102/A:1009850119329

Binalti, A.O. 2012. Growth and Income Equality : A Comparative Analysis. Economics Research International. 12(2). pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/569890.

Boikova, T., & Dahs, A. 2018. Inequality and Economics Growth Across Countries of the Eurozone. International Journal of Sustainable Economy.10(4). pp. 315. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2018.095254.

Cooper, Donald R., & Pamela S.Schindler. 2011. Business Research Methods. 11th ed. New York : Mc Graw-Hill Companies Inc.

Dean, R., William H, L., & David McKee. 2010. Spatial Economic Theory. New York : The Free Press.

De Fretes, P.N. 2017. Analisis Sektor Unggulan (LQ), Struktur Ekonomi (Shift Share) dan Proyeksi PDRB Provinsi Papua 2018. Jurnal Development. 1(2). pp.21-40.

Duggio, M. 2019. The Influence of Cooperative Development on Economic Performance Welfare of Society in Bali Province. Journal of Economics and Finance.7(5). pp. 28-38.

Dunn, Edgar, S, Jr. The Equilibrium of Land Use Pattern in Agriculture. New York : The Free Press.

Edward, Mary E. 2017. Regional and Urban Economics and Economics Development : Theory and Methods. German : Duke University Press.

Elfindri, Hendro E. & Zamzami. 2019. Ekonomi Pembangunan Daerah. Surabaya : Rajagrafindo Persada.

Fodness, D & Murray. 2017. Tourist Information Search. Journal Analisis of Tourism Research. Vol 3. pp. 503-523.

Fiedmann, J & William, A. 2016. Regional Policy : Readings in Theory and Applications.

Cambridge : The M.I.T. Press.

Gopalakrisnan, S., & Damanpour, F. 2017. A Review of Innovation Research in Economic, Sociology and Technology Management. Omega. 25 (1). pp. 15-28.

Heikkila, E.J. 2019. The Economic of Planning, Center for Urban Policy Research. New Yersey : The Free Press.

Higgins, Benyamin and Donal J.Savoie. 1999. Regional Development Theories & Their Application. New York Brunswick : Transaction Publisher.

Hunt, Diana, 2019. Economics Theories of Development : An Analysis of Competing Paradigms. New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram. 2015. Integral and External Integration for Product Development : The Contingency Effects of Uncertaninty, Equivocality and Platform Strategy. Decision Sciences. 36(1). pp. 97-133.

Kukliski, Antoni. 2015. Regional Disagregation of National Policies and Plans. Paris : Mouton & Co.

Kumar, A.,S.Saroj, P.K Joshi and H.Takeshima. 2018. Does Cooperative Membership Improve Household Welfare? Evidence from a Panel Data Analysis of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Bihar India. International Food Policy Research Institute. Vol.75. pp. 24-36.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2013. Analisis Spasial dan Regional : Studi Aglomerasi dan Kluster Industri Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Penerbit AMP YKPN.

Lessmann, C. 2012. Regional Inequality and Decentralization : An Empirical Anaysis, Environment and Planning. Economy and Space. 44(6). pp. 1363-1388. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44267

Lewis, D.B. & Jasmin C. 2014. Central Development Spending in Regions : Post Decentralization. BIES. 40(3). pp. 379-394.

Mankiw, N.Gregory. 2019. Essential of Economics. 9th ed. Boton : Cengage Learning.

McKee, David, L., Robert D.D & William H.L. 2015. Regional Economics : Theory and Practice. New York : The Free Press.

McCann, Philip.2011. Urban and Regional Economics. USA : Oxford University Press.

Miller, M. 2011. Location Quotient Basic Tool for Economic Development Analysis. Economic Development Review. Volume 9(2). pp. 65-81.

Potter, M.E. 2010. The Competitive Advantage of Nation. London : The Mac MillanPres.Ltd.

Putra, D.A. 2019. Sektor Jasa Masih Jadi Pendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Liputan6.com. https//www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/3889389/sektor-jasa-masih-jadi-pendorong-pertumbuhan ekonomi-indonesia.

Ranis, G & Frances S. 2014. Decentralization in Indonesia. BIES. 30(10). pp. 32-47.

Riza, Fathia Rahmi. 2015. Pengaruh Sektor Unggulan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi KotaPadang Panjang. http://scholar.unand.ac.id/629/1/21

Ron, Hood. 1998. Economic Analysis : A Location Quotient. Primer Principal Sun Region. Associates, Inc.

Samuelson & William D.Nordhaus. 2009. Macroeconomics. New York : McGraw Hill.

Sekaran, Uma. 2015. Research Methods for Business. Edisi 2. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Silver, C, Iwan J.A & Larry, S. 2010. Intergovermental Transfersand Decentralization in Indonesia. BIES. 37. pp. 345-362.

Simanjuntak, R.A. 2019. Otonomi Daerah dan Desentralisasi Fiskal. Makalah Disampaikan Pada Seminar Nasional Platform Untuk Masa Depan Ekonomi Indonesia. Padang, 15 April 2019.

Sjafrizal. 2003. Regional Autonomy Impacts : The Case of West Sumatera. Paper Presented in the 3rd Indonesian Regional Science Association International Conference. Jakarta 20-21 Maret 2003.

Sjafrijal. 2018. Ekonomi Regional Teori dan Aplikasi. Padang : Baduose Media.

Sjafrijal. 2014. Ekonomi Wilayah dan Perkotaan. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tarigan, Robinson. 2015. Ekonomi Regional Teori dan Aplikasi. Edisi Revisi. Cetakan Ketujuh. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara.

UU Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah.

UU Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah.

UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Otonomi Desa.

Weis, John. 2015. Economic Policy in Developing Countries : The Reform Agenda. New York : Prentice Hall

Published
2023-01-31